Accelerated R&D
Cost parity with conventional dairy by 2027–2028. Shorten R&D cycles.
Strategic Context
Better Dairy’s priorities in R&D and manufacturing span accelerating time-to-market, increasing screening throughput, and scaling from benchtop to pilot. The four pillars below capture these strategic ambitions.
Cost parity with conventional dairy by 2027–2028. Shorten R&D cycles.
Scale from 5,000 L pilot to industrial volumes by 2030. Easy transition from benchtop to pilot plant.
FDA GRAS and EFSA Novel Food compliance with full traceability. 21 CFR Part 11 ready out of the box.
Unified control platform and elimination of manual data entry. Reduce media and manual labour costs.
Identified Challenges
Key process bottlenecks and risks in Better Dairy’s operations — from manual sampling to hardware lock-in and data fragmentation.
Manual 24/7 sampling of Pichia cultures in the 6,000 sq. ft. Hackney Wick facility increases contamination risks and data variability. Vulnerability: Contamination and inconsistent sampling undermine 21 CFR Part 11 integrity and reproducibility for FDA submissions.
Pilot plant expansions (e.g. 3 L–70 L) are limited by fixed-port legacy bioreactors that cannot scale without full system redesign. Vulnerability: Vendor lock-in and capital intensity slow scale-up and limit flexibility.
Existing Sartorius/Applikon hardware in the Hackney Wick lab operates in data silos, requiring manual aggregation for reporting and process optimization. Vulnerability: Inefficient data use, no centralized control, and higher cost of modifications from incumbent vendors.
Precision fermentation with Pichia requires exact methanol dosing; manual or on-off feeding leads to cell toxicity or low protein yields. Vulnerability: Suboptimal induction reduces product titer and delays cost parity and commercial scale-up.
Paper-based logs and manual data entry in R&D hinder 21 CFR Part 11 compliance required for FDA and EFSA submissions. Vulnerability: Audit findings and delayed approvals for GRAS and Novel Food dossiers without non-editable audit trails.
Opportunities Analysis
X: Urgency · Y: Impact · Size: Difficulty of Implementation
Hover bubbles to highlight corresponding opportunity cards.
Manual 24/7 sampling increases contamination risk and data variability in multi-vessel Pichia and osteopontin runs.
Manual or on-off methanol feeding causes toxicity or low protein yields; exponential feeding is critical for AOX1 induction.
Paper-based logs and manual data entry hinder 21 CFR Part 11 compliance and slow FDA/EFSA submissions.
Sartorius/Applikon hardware operates in silos; full replacement is costly and vendor modifications are expensive.
Fixed bioreactor configurations and manual TFF/buffer exchange limit scale-up and gentle handling of fragile proteins (e.g. osteopontin).
QB Systems Solution Proposal
Targeted solutions designed to resolve the identified Better Dairy friction points.
Integrated QB AutoSampler and QB Control eliminate manual 24/7 sampling with aseptic 5-stage decontamination and full data traceability.
QB Precise Dosing (SPM-001) with QB Control recipe-driven exponential feeding for Pichia methanol induction. Ideal for fed-batch and perfusion.
Extend capabilities of existing systems (e.g. Sartorius/Applikon bioreactors) with QB Edge and QB Control; flexible integration with a variety of vendors for centralized control and audit trail.
QB TFF with pressure sensors and centrifugal pump (PMP-003) for automatic TMP regulation and low-shear concentration (e.g. osteopontin).
Need a custom configuration? We can propose a setup tailored to your processes.
Request a Demo / Bioprocess Audit →Operational Impact & Use Cases
Time savings, contamination reduction, and deployment speed.
| Metric | Result / Example |
|---|---|
| Time Savings | Up to 72 h unattended operation with AutoSampler; 30-day full setup delivery (case study). |
| Contamination Reduction | 5-stage path decontamination (Air Purge, Wash, Rinse, Dry, Disinfect) to minimise cross-contamination risk in high-value osteopontin runs. |
| Setup Speed | Entire bioreactor setup delivered and operational in 30 days (QB case study); retrofit of Sartorius bioreactors in ~3 months. |
Articles Gallery
Topics: Modular bioreactors vs monoblocks, the future of aseptic sampling, retrofitting legacy lab equipment.
How modular, software-defined lab systems reduce cost and time and enable the "lab of tomorrow" with dynamic P&ID and centralized data.
Read More → ComplianceDigitization, automation, and simplification for QC labs: audit trails, LIMS integration, and vendor-agnostic QB Control for compliance and efficiency.
Read More → IntegrationExtending existing SCADA and bioreactor systems with QB Control via OPC UA, Modbus, MQTT; retrofit and multi-vendor integration without full replacement.
Read More →Contact & Call to Action
Contact us for a tailored demo or bioprocess audit.